Why the Bombay HC order banning construction is stupid

The Bombay High Court has again passed some kind of an order prohibiting the municipal corporation from giving permissions for construction of any new building because of its inability to handle the waste crisis being faced by Mumbai. The media will be reluctant to capture my thoughts in quotes but I do have the freedom (hopefully and the tolerance of the Judges) to say it on my own blog post that the court order is totally stupid. It might have been passed with some other purpose in mind but not for solving the waste issue.

There is no relationship between additional construction and the current waste management crisis. Managed well, even if the garbage generated doubles there would still be no need for the current type of dumping grounds and only a fraction of land required for a single scientific land fill. To re iterate, if today Mumbai is generating 10,000 tonnes of waste and we have a crisis, then handled my way ( yes I will say my way) Mumbai can generate 20,000 tonnes of waste per day and I will assure closure of Deonar by 2020 and lush green parks and playgrounds on the same site by 2030. Let the buildings keep coming up and generating more waste. Open challenge to the Bombay HC and MCGM.

If I can show you ten buildings which are not sending any waste to Deonar today then I can very easily (with resources which are all being charred by MCGM currently) make 100,000 buildings also not send any waste to Deonar or any other dump. That is the key aspect, which makes the current order look so stupid.

If there is a ONE BIG co-relation it is between the failure of the Bombay HC in carrying out contempt proceedings for non-compliance of grand orders passed on waste management issues in the past 15 years by its own self. Something tells me that it would be expecting too much for the Judges or the Court to be doing that. If only the Judges who have passed this order, studied orders passed by their predecessors over the past 10-15 years – and more notably those by Justice Chandrachud and decided to initiate contempt proceedings against all the IAS officers who have handled or currently handle the relevant departments then it would have made more impact.

Just when did we last see the Court prosecute any senior official or politicians for any of its PIL orders in the past? PILs have become a joke. Only blind worshiping bhakts of the judicial system have faith in PILs because their blind belief enables them to not stray their looks and look at the reality.

Fine non-complying buildings Rs. 3000 for every instance of non-segregation back to back and the most stubborn and wealthy of buildings will end up complying. If MCGM is incapable, incompetent or insincere in implementing MSW 2000 then let them say so, let the Court take cognizance of it and lets talk ahead. But lets not waste time with these kind of stupid orders. Have a look at this public advertisement by MCGM in 2001 here

Materials below for those who might have missed them before or those whose eyes only keep glazing over all the evidence.

What a zero waste building looks like at this link

Suggestions to the MCGM for SWM in DP 2014 at this video


The Grand Cosmic Plan – to annihilate all life on earth

In brief, the Grand Cosmic Plan is to annihilate all life on planet earth and convert it into a barren wasteland thus bringing it in consonance with the state of all celestial bodies in the solar system, the Milky Way and most of the universe as we know it. And human beings have been put on earth by the Cosmos to execute this plan.

The April 2015 issue of National Geographic dawned upon me the Grand Cosmic Plan, in a roundabout manner. It is quite pertinent that a magazine, which introduced me to most of my life’s strongest vocations should also chose to reveal this plan to me. There was a story about the pine beetle infection affecting millions of acres of forests in North America and how it is a fall out of a warming planet. It was sad to see the images of those lifeless stands of once lush forests. I could relate to the issue locally with the enormous sadness experienced at the rapid loss of a large number of rain trees in Mumbai to the mealy bug infection and the helpless bystanders that so many of us were left to become. Of course in the case of rain trees in Mumbai my strong hunch is that the mealy bug has been introduced on them selectively by a group to kill them, unlike a natural spread like in case of the pine beetle.

The same issue had a story celebrating 25 years of the Hubble Telescopes voyage and the fascinating set of imagery from the space that it has provided us with. Having myself chased the earliest of images in the 90s I could experience some distant excitement, which was soon to be overrun with a commentary about how there is always so much of funding for space research and exploration of life in space while we are hell bent on annihilating it all on the one celestial body which we know has enough of it. What could explain this irony?

I saw some of the images carried, the familiar red black golden hue to all the images, sparking stars, an experience of desolation and the realisation that we are talking of distances in light years here. In so many years of space exploration through millions of light years we have not discovered similar celestial bodies as earth brimming with so much life and diversity.

Those on the nature side agonize over what we have wrought on the planet and all the crimes we are doing as a species by defiling the only planet which has life and so much beauty in an otherwise barren and lifeless universe. These people find fault with many human needs, which are extractive and cause rampant death and destruction of nature. Many attach moral or religious overtones to this misconduct of humans, suggesting that what is happening is grossly wrong and nature or the gods will one day punish the species for such gross lack of respect for god’s creation.

But what if all of the death, destruction, lack of respect being brought upon nature and life on earth is part of the plan of these very gods or some other god more powerful than our own creations?

How is it that in the millions of celestial bodies we know in the universe it is only this small body called earth, which shows such an incredible diversity of life forms?

How can it be that there is absolutely nothing which exists on any of the other planets? It is not necessary that everything should be exactly as found on earth. Species and organisms conducive to environments found on other celestial bodies could have evolved, but we see just nothing anywhere.

How and why is it that efforts at saving the earth and a better environment are always such a struggle, difficult to motivate the masses, difficult to get funding, difficult on almost all fronts conceivable? While those on the other side have it all going well. Have a great idea to make it more convenient for people to consume more? You have investors climbing over each other to write you a check. And big amounts at that, while an environmental or social do-good idea will find you begging your self-respect out for even a small amount. The best of human resource on the other side compared to bleeding hearts on the environment side. Things should not be so difficult if you are doing something good; if you are really aligned with the Grand Cosmic Plan? So possibly all the do-good efforts are really not aligned with the Grand Cosmic Plan much as it will be disagreeable to the environmental minority.

The comic eye – as I will call this god – or the creator or a strong energy field which immerses the universe must at some point have taken a serious note of the rapid rate at which species were evolving on this particular speck of the universe. From being a large mass of molten gas the speck was cooling, solidifying and creating the right bio chemical environment for different life forms to develop. Slowly this entity called nature started showing up on this celestial body. As nature took root it developed enormous ability to propagate itself and develop newer forms of life, different climatic regions developed and a corresponding diversity of species developed as well which were adapted to these climatic conditions. As much life was there terrestrially, far much more developed in the oceans. The earth became one incredible ingredient rich soup bowl, standing out sharply and distinctly from these other specks of geology in the universe.

The cosmos was a mute spectator to this evolving drama, not able to register what was happening. Forests, grasses, fungi, bacteria and complex organisms, organisms which crawl, which fly, which run, some which are the size of nails and some the size of dinosaurs. It was all getting crazy and out of hand.

This presumably was not acceptable to the cosmos. Nature must have become the invasive species, which was rapidly infesting what was designed to be a desolate, lifeless landscape.

It can be argued that in the grand scheme of things earth does not even count as infinitesimal in the universe. Why take serious note of what was happening over here? Let an exception exist. Possibly there must have been a real threat that at some point the same process could transmit from earth and start on some of these other celestial bodies as well.

And this is when the cosmos took a decision to halt this invasion by nature. It was decided then to develop an anti dote to this poison that was spreading across earth. As with snake poison, the anti-dote would have to come from nature itself. And this is where the grand plan began to develop. It was decided to turn one of the species developed by nature against itself.

Keeping the incredible resilience of nature and ability to rebound in mind it was felt that it was necessary that the efforts made to contain nature were just not aimed at containing it but at completely annihilating it, leaving it with absolutely no ability to rebound back in anyway and make it similar to any of the lifeless, barren celestial bodies in the universe.

And what a wonderful job this anti-dote is doing. Humans are not just containing nature but working towards overwhelming it to not be able to rebound in anyways and paving the way for complete annihilation. And from the look of things the Grand Cosmic Plan will succeed. Though it must be a good two centuries to be anywhere close to completion, there is way too much life still on earth.

It was important to provide the anti-dote with a potent mechanism to counter the poison. Intelligence, emotions, desire, insecurity are those mechanisms which have made the anti-dote so potent. One can be quite certain that with all the doomsday scenarios played out about the effect of environmental degradation and climate change on the planet (and eventually on the human species) humans will be the one species that will last till the very end exiting only after it has accomplished  the Grand Cosmic Plan.

Will humans move to another planet after having annihilated all life on earth? I don’t think so as much as enthusiastic efforts are underway. If the cosmic plan is to bring earth to the same state as other celestial bodies then you don’t want the human species to end up altering another celestial body’s architecture. The species will find itself being the last life form to be extinguished from the planet. But yes possibly the last of the human species’ future could be consigned to be on a star ship Enterprise forever travelling into deep space.

Look at all the signs around; all of them suggest how the cosmos is supporting everybody who will support its plans. Environmental groups struggle for funding while prime ministers and presidents get heavy funding from the oil lobby and are completely subservient to their diktats on policy and administrative response to the environment and climate change.  Those who on the side of the grand cosmic plan have ensured that all political and social systems have been subverted and nothing can stall or slow the process.

America and China and Apple and Foxconn are all part of the cosmic plan. Those flattening the rain forests and those eating beef and growing palm oil plantations, the Indian establishments obdurate view on climate change, the Japanese hunger for whales and Chinese for ivory and tiger penises are all in absolute sync with the Grand Cosmic Plan.

One of the biggest evidence of the GCP is the fact that this is a species which is intelligent enough and can see the writing on the wall and yet incapable of doing anything about it.

So, now there is no need to feel bad about consumption and pollution. No need to listen to those advices of not changing phones and gadgets frequently. Let those rare earth minerals be mined more frequently. When the phone dies don’t throw dispose it responsibly. Make sure to go and fling it into the nearest dirty river. A million people doing it will help us achieve the cosmic plan sooner.

No need to be worried about nuclear energy and the problem of nuclear waste. From the cosmic point of view the nuclear waste is all coming from within the planet itself. If nuclear waste helps achieve the aim of a desolate poisoned, lifeless landscape faster, the better still. No point in lobbying for renewable energy. The cosmic eye never saw any need for energy in the first place, renewable or non-renewable. In a desolate landscape where is the need for energy consumption? The purpose of addicting the human species to all those energy guzzling needs is precisely to help achieve the plan.

It is time those who are trying to save nature and the environment hang up their boots, stop leading troubled agonizing lives. Their pain comes from the resistance to the cosmic plan. All resistance is futile in front of the almighty cosmos. It is foolishness and arrogance to not read the writing on the wall and to think that they are in fact on the side of the cosmos. Billions of people who go about enjoying or making two ends meet without any thought about saving the planet have been put there for a purpose.

Alternate locations for the Line 3 Metro Yard away from Aarey

The location of the yard for Line 3 Metro Yard is becoming one of the more contentious issues facing the preservation of the Aarey Milk Colony. Very little information is publicly available about the Metro Yard on the MMRDA website section for Line 3 here.

I started this post around a week before publishing date and by now have put in this letter – Metro3 yard from Aarey to BPT. There have been a whole lot more developments.

Using Port Trust Lands for Metro Line 3 yard

In the first map below the area marked in blue is roughly the area which is being earmarked and currently fenced of for development of the yard. Some representative pictures of the area are also shown.

Map 3 shows the alignment of the Line 3 Metro. A shed has to be made at either of the terminals to service the metro coaches. As per the current communications with the authorities the car shed can only be constructed at either of the terminal points. Since there is no land at the Cuffe Parade end, Aarey has been chosen. But a car shed can also be situated at land anywhere along the route as well. In the case of the Mumbai Suburban Railway car sheds are situated at Mahalaxmi and Parel. Similarly car sheds for the Line3 can be situated around the middle of the route. An extended underground arm can bring the coaches to the port trust and where land can be created in one of the plots marked in Map4.

How Mumbai should be using the port trust lands has been a topic of discussion for very long. Approximately 1000 acres of and will be available for the city and parcels of it are already available for use as of 2014. More information on the port trusts lands and a citizens plan is available here.

Just as Aarey is land owned by the government (Govt. of Maharashtra) similarly the Bombay Port Trust lands are owned by the government (Govt. of India). It stands to good reason that in larger public interest two important infrastructure needs of Mumbai’s citizens is met simultaneously.  One preserving and oxygen giving factory and second a car shed for an important public transport project.

Will this proposal cost more? Yes it might, because additional underground sections will have to be developed running 1-3 kms in length. But at this stage of the project it is absolutely doable because construction has not started. Any later and then it could cause some inconvenience.

Are activists and community being party spoilers? Most certainly not. If anything this will become a very strong lesson for MMRDA and other agencies executing public projects that it really does not help to be high handed and  nontransparent during the planning process thinking that if they were able to get their way till the close of project the same will be true when they start executing. When bits and pieces and soon enough the whole project plan becomes public domain knowledge peoples pressure hits back sometimes and in the case of Line 3 Metro it has hit with force to contend with. I wrote this post earlier – Sincere City, Not Smart City. When there is an all around (not just administration) lack of sincere affection and regard for how Mumbai develops then this is what happens.

Could Line 1 Metro Car shed have been used for Line 3 as well?

One of the points I have been making regarding the location of the Metro Yard for Line 3 is that possibly the same yard which has been developed for Metro Line 1 could have been used to service the coaches of the Line 3 as well. Below is the GE image of the yard for servicing Line 1 Metro coaches. The Line 1 and Line 3 intersect each other at Marol. It shouldn’t be very difficult to construct a ramp around Marol which would connect Line 3 with Line 1 and the coaches could have been served at the same yard? I think it was doable. It is all history now and cannot be done but we should not resist from doing an in study to qualify or disqualify this possibility.

The below image shows the Metro 1 Yard plot and the purple + yellow area together is 30 acres. The yellow area alone is approx. 8 acres and has been carved out from the plot for creating a big residential complex with high rises. Now instead of these high rises the same plot could have been used to create additional capacity for car shed space. There could possibly been a double deck yard as well. The ramp can be seen on the left side of the image. It goes down from the Metro corridor. One arm could have taken the coaches to a first floor deck. There is absolutely no pressing need for additional residential capacity in this area. Yes it was private land in a legal dispute (and we as a city should know full details of what transpired) and a settlement had to be reached but the State could have used a combination of good compensation and eminent domain to ensure that the complete plot was kept for a car shed, that too in the context where Line 2 and 3 were already on drawing board and not conceptualised subsequently.

This is also a good example of the shoddy urban planning of Mumbai.

The purple bigger portion is 30 acres and the carved out light yellow portion is 8 acres.

The purple bigger portion is 30 acres and the carved out light yellow portion is 8 acres.

The tall skyscrapers correspond to the yellow potion in the GE map

The tall skyscrapers correspond to the yellow potion in the GE map. The roof top next to it is the Metro Yard.

Dust in BKC, MMRDA’s paranoia, stupid rules and feudal high handedness in ‘smart’ BKC

Crazy dust levels are a bane in Mumbai, posing severe health hazards besides making the city look no different from the situation in villages and Tier 2 and 3 cities and robbing it of sophistication. This post is about the ridiculous way construction sites are running in Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), the pride of Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) and completely governed by them. There is absolute violation of all environmental rules about dust management and how construction sites should operate. Rules and techniques are clearly there to have zero dust around construction sites as I have recorded in photos from Hong Kong in the second part of this post. It is interesting to see how the who’s who and so educated of BKC go about seeing this on a daily basis and do nothing.

Earlier in the year Mumbai Mirror had carried a story Somebody call Bob the builder! on the same subject and I was quoted as under

Mass transport expert and environment activist Rishi Aggarwal says it’s just callousness on the part of various agencies that leads to the kind of mess that Mumbai finds itself today. “There is never going to be a point where a city is done with all development work. But does that mean we will have to put up with this chaos forever? The way out is strict enforcement of norms,” he said.

Today I was invited to give a byte for a video film on Mithi and asked to come to Bandra Kurla Complex. Similarly invited was my friend and free lance journalist Nidhi Jamwal and since we stay close by I joined her in her car. Since we reached a bit early we decided to move around and get the Sunday feel of BKC.

Along the way Nidhi had her first look at the pathetic cycling tracks launched with much fanfare by MMRDA three years back and photographed them. But that is a separate topic of discussion.

Moving towards the Mithi we passed the point on the map shown as BKC 1 where we passed the first dust site and I took photos with a bit of caution because I had already seen the security stir up even seeing the car stop. Moving ahead we came to the road behind the Dhirubhai Ambani School. It is an isolated stretch with very less traffic and here I again saw a large amount of dust and truck trails on the road. This time I was annoyed and decided to get down and record this properly.

Even as I had just started taking the photos a jeep came in from the opposite side filled with 5-6 men. The jeep stopped by our car and the  men started jumping out and rushing in typical intimidating style. They asked me to immediately stop taking photos since photography was strictly prohibited in the area. At this point I got aggressive and asked them who were they and who has made the rules to which they answered that they were security kept by MMRDA  and it is them who has made the rule. Any point about the dust etc. was lost on them as was my shouting that I will be showing these pictures to the Metropolitan Commissioner tomorrow. I decided to call up Mr. Dilip Kawathkar MMRDAs Joint Project Director who confirmed that yes there was a prohibition on taking photos and permissions have to be taken from a certain Mr. Wankhede who I presume is the person mentioned here and here

This is bizarre and nothing short of feudal. This is a public property and the streets can certainly not be part of a photography prohibition. As a citizen activist I am continuously taking photos of the governments negligence in providing even the most basic of infrastructure and amenities to the citizens. This helps in redresal. Now even photos cant be taken?! Dereliction of duty in the first place and intimidation if documenting it.

And then you see these kind of cheesy stories on Smart BKC? Hong Kong also has rapacious capitalists but they have some interest in a clean and well managed HK.


Or these pies in the sky – talking cake when people dont have bread.


Firstly the way the men were traveling and the intimidating manner in which they approached me is completely unbecoming of how an agency like MMRDA should be keeping security people for any purpose. They looked more like the goons and henchmen kept by illegal mining barons or like some militia of the kind of ISIS images we are seeing on TV. Knowing the land politics of BKC and the politicians-developer nexus which controls it, it is quite clear that institutions are just a nice front to show behind which feudal diktats and controls operate.

Secondly,what is this nonsense about not photographing even on the roads? In July I was hauled up by the ultra-paranoid security at the US Consulate even as I was standing on the footpath outside their building and photographing the diamond bourse with the upcoming convention center in the foreground. Nothing to do with the consulate, nor were they in the frame anywhere but still I was brought in by the security, made to sit for an hour while procedure and deletion of photos took place.

In 2012 I visited Hong Kong for the first time and took photos of the West Kowloon Terminus from a nearby skywalk, which I have carried subsequently in this post. Not once was I stopped, there just was no intimidation in the air. I could see police and guards at some frequency but their job was not to intimidate common citizens. The Peoples Republic of China was not paranoid in spite of being an autocracy and here we have MMRDA – quite symptomatic of the bogus two paisa democracy that India is. This is of course the private estate of some of the best known politicians and builders in the city.

I will stand vindicated when the next big terrorist attack takes place successfully at BKC in spite of all this ridiculous paranoia, intimidation and assault on liberty. As I keep mentioning to all these people that those who will do the damage will have the best of images taken without these jokers even getting a whiff. Of course the innocent will suffer with no effect on these jokers but then did somebody say something about how evil benefits from the silence of the good?

Thirdly, anybody interested in labour rights and the conditions of construction workers need not be holding up for whats happening in Qatar

Woes of India’s Labour in Gulf

Sushma Swaraj vows to work for migrant Indian workers in Gulf nations

Sushma Swaraj could well come and champion for the rights of those who are working at the sites in BKC and especially the large one near the concrete plant marked as BKC 3 in the map below.

Labour could be seen living and working in the most unhygienic and completely unpleasant surroundings. Forget getting into private areas, BKC is completely under MMRDA and consequently Government of Maharashtra jurisdiction. I this the commitment to the various conventions and policies that GoM is party to? We were moving around in an AC car so we are unaffected but the moment you step out is hell.

This is how they do it in Hong Kong. This is the site of West Kowloon Terminus which I visited in March 2012. This a government of China project contracted to private engineering firms. The highest work area management standards could be seen as borne in pictures below.

Take the issue up and make noise about work area management rules at all construction sites. Making Mumbai dust free is possible if only citizens are interested in such an outcome.

And if you can take some more

Why Peltophorum is not a good tree for Mumbai?

I feel a bit stupid for not having recorded this long long ago considering how strongly I feel about it but nevertheless.

So let me state the position very clearly. The Peltophorum tree is the most common tree in Mumbai today. It has been the favourite in plantation drives by the municipal corporation over the years. But peltophorum is not a good tree to plant and Mumbai should take steps to discontinue planting the peltophorum. Here is why:

The first two are the principal guiding points and the others derive from these and especially from point two.

1) Trees are long terms investments. Trees last for 30-50 years and even more. Just as there are lock-in features in a number of other investments like financial product, an educational degree you may choose or a career decision similarly in the case of trees it is difficult/almost impossible to reverse a decision after planting and nurturing a tree for a while.

2) While planting a tree you have to be really (and I mean really) greedy. Following from point one when you are investing in a financial product or an education or career you are looking at maximising your investment on a number of accounts income, self-fulfillment, happiness of others. But to be greedy you need to be intelligent and know your trees well.

Things to be greedy for in trees.

What is the primary reason why trees are planted for? Shade? Yes, shade is the primary reason why trees are planted. But then there are a number of trees which give shade. You have to look at a few things besides just shade when planting trees.

1) Is it a native or a non-native tree? This is the most important consideration and if you get this right then in most cases you would have secured a long term worthwhile investment. If a tree has been part of the Indian geographical region and more specifically of the region in which your city is located then over millions of years the tree has acquired properties which makes it a very natural part of the local climate and other factors. Trees like peltophorum, Gulmohur, Rain tree are trees which have been around in India only fairly recently, extending to about three hundred years. Three hundred years is absolutely nothing when considering geological time – the time for which the earth and various plant and animal forms have been around. In three hundred years these trees have not intermingled with local birds, diseases, pests, pollinating factors etc.

The recent epidemic scale infestation of rain trees by the mealy bug is a good example of how decades of efforts can be laid to waste if the right tree species is not chosen. Till even a year ago nobody could have imagined that the tall, strong and such huge shade giving rain trees could be reduced to absolute dust by a teeny-weeny bug. We have no idea if going in the future there will be an infection or a bug which will solely target the peltophorum tree.While it is still to be conclusively proven some of us are speculating whether the mealy bug epidemic suffered by the rain trees could be a result of climate change? And if that is the case we need to be very careful for the coming years.

When it is a long term investment it pays to look into what can happen a few years hence.

2) When considering other factors, the most important one is whether the tree supports other associated species like birds and butterflies? When you are going to have a tree around for more than 30 years it is good to have a tree which attracts different kinds of birds and butterflies to feast on nectar or fruits that the tree provides.

Where I stay – I am on the third floor – I am lucky to receive a line of coconut palm trees which have reached to roughly the same height over a few years. And boy what a feast for the senses that is! The coconut palm flowers attract a great variety of birds and in the case of my palms all are available for viewing at an eye level. Purple sunbirds, bulbuls, Magpie Robin, Tickels Flowerpecker, a common kingfisher is the latest addition. All these birds add a lot of colour, melody and engagement with the tree. Right below is a slow growing and short guava tree which supports parakeets and an occasional coppersmith (call here)besides some of the ones on the palms. There is a banyan tree in one corner of the garden and that provides abundant berries.

In cases of the peltophorum, the trees flowers and fruit are not attractive to a single bird or butterfly species. If you were to stand for long in the presence of a peltophorum tree you realise what a silent, friendless, lifeless tree it is. You feel a bit sad about the tree as well about the whole idea of planting such a tree in the first place.

A few pics from what I get to see from the third floor.

3) Another factor which makes peltophorum a bad choice for Mumbai is leaf fall. Lets be very clear that there is a difference between a tree in an urban area and one in a forest. A forest floor has the luxury of accepting any amount of leaf litter. The same cannot be the case for an urban road or compound. Look at my favourite trees again – the lagestromium sheds leaves only once in a year sometime around December.Another favourite, the karanj is an absolute darling! This is almost evergreen or semi-deciduous and so very little leaf fall.

What about the peltophorum? Whole year! Yes the whole year the tree will keep shedding its tiny leaves. If a road, which has peltophorum trees is left unswept for a few days there will be a heap of fallen leaves below it. It is a troubling sight for me to see the municipal sweepers having to labour so much to collect all the leaf fall. And then many times disposing it can be so much of a pain that it is burnt in small heaps adding to pollution.

4) Local context is extremely important while planting trees. As an absolute simple example you cannot plant a tree with a very wide canopy in a narrow road and it would be waste to plant a short crown tree on a wide tree. There can be other factors like nature of habitation around, garden or road side, presence of absence of utilities under the surface and more. In the absence of context sensitive planting you can be left with a tree which can be a nuisance at times.

5) Beauty can be subjective but you need to know trees to realise how there are some trees out there which are so much more beautiful than the peltophorum and deserve to be planted on this point alone. Below are photos from the flowering Amaltas. The sight of these flowers can never be compared by a peltophorum, which can at times be so celebrated. The flowers of Amaltas are an absolute delight and a celebration. The other great advantage with the Amaltas is that it is tree of extremely modest proportions, which completely suits an urban agenda.

Karanj has one of the most beautiful green shade in its foliage compared to the darkish green, dead complexion foliage of the peltophorum

My top favourites are as below. In separate entries I will speak about what I like so much about these trees. I would strongly recommend planting of these trees where a rain tree has been left unrecoverable from the mealy bug infestation.

Jarul/Taman (common local name), Lagestromia speciosa or Queens Flower. This is also the State Flower of Maharashtra


Karanj, Pongamia pinnata


Amaltas, Cassia fistula

People can only go ooh and aah on seeing the yellow flowers of peltophorum till they have not seen the Amaltas tree.

Kadam, Neolamarckia cadamba






If you agree with the points in this post and feel that peltophorum plantation should be discontinued and the trees mentioned above – and some more – should be given a prominence then please do comment on this post and also write to the MCGM, Chairman, Tree Authority. every comment and letter to the MCGM strengthens the efforts. You can help achieve a better quality of tree cover for Mumbai.

Letter on Coast Road

While I have been opposing the coast road for more than two years, this is the first formal letter – a long critique – that I have put in. The acknowledged letters are below and I will keep adding more acknowledgements here as I submit the letters to the relevant authorities.

To reiterate it is the gross neglect of so much else that needs to be done for Mumbai’s transport that really disappoints, saddens and angers me against the project.

Coast Road Letter March 2014

If you see merit in the arguments please do sign the petition at link below


and like it at


The MCGM report on coast road can be viewed at this link

Proposed new solid waste management rules – comments

The Ministry of Environment and Forests has come up with draft Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2013. The rules will overrule the existing rules which were framed in 2000 here. The Ministry has given a period of 60 days (from 29.08.2013) for public to respond with their views and suggestions.

It is important that everybody concerned with the issue of a clean city to engage with this process. The issue is not just one of a clean city but the philosophy towards waste management and the processes that will be followed. A number of activists have been carrying out efforts over the years without broad based public involvement. Please do consider organising programs around this issue where some of the members involved with the issue for long would love to come and speak.

The rules seem to have been put together in a hurry with incorporating the learnings from a number of developments since the 2000 Rules.

The proposed rules have a number of flaws, which I am highlighting below.

  1. The Ministry must share what necessitated the need for a new set of rules. Whether a note on the same is prepared and should share the same.
  2. The rules lack commentary on the serious constraints involved with developing new landfill sites. Competing demands for land are now stronger than they were when the rules were last formed in 2000. Land is needed to housing, infrastructure, farming and recreation and hence needs to be low in the priority of solid waste management.
  3. The rules do not adequately stress on the need for municipal corporations to go beyond the call of duty in sensitizing the citizens about not mixing wet and dry waste at source and hence minimising the need for centralised collection and transport of waste and landfill requirements.
    1. If in MSW 2000 this need was felt and appreciated adequately the developments since then have only increased the importance of reducing as much waste at source as possible. MSW 2013 Rules need to in fact start getting stringent about not accepting any mixed waste at source and levying fines for the same.
    2. The Rules should adequately acknowledge the services provided by rag pickers, the significant self-employment generated as a result and the need for municipal corporations to formally recognize the contribution by them.
    3. The Ministry should be abundantly aware that a lot of the requirements expected in the MSW 2000 Rules have been violated with gross impunity.
  4. The Rules should comment that due to the following important considerations there will be a strong focus on the minimisation of transport of waste over long distance. The transport of waste over long distance leads to
    1.  Use of fossil fuels which leads to release of GHG emissions which leads to long term environmental damage. India has a National Acton Plan on Climate Change and is a participant in global talks on mitigating climate change. The municipal waste management rules need to clearly be compliant with these efforts in letter and spirit.
    2. Air pollution from emissions which lead to immediate health impacts to the residents of the city.
    3. Loss of foreign exchange and hence economically harms the country. This is important in years like 2013, when we are facing a crisis.
    4. Expenditure on expensive machinery and
    5. Overall puts a strain on the municipal budget of the respective city.
  5. MSW 2013 Rules need to give very explicit guidance/instructions to the municipal corporations for engaging substantially in activities towards creating awareness about segregation of garbage and all other measures to treat biodegradable waste at source through various means. This creating of awareness will be through (and not limited to) advertisements in papers, television, schools, colleges, cinema halls, funding civil society organisations for road shows and all other means.
  6. MSW Rules 2013 should stress on very high standards of financial reporting about the complete costs involved in waste management.
  7. MSW Rules 2013 should stress on detailed disclosure on all the kinds of waste being generated in the city.
  8. MSW Rules 2013 do not adequately address the issue of electronic waste. Electronic waste generation is now huge in India and significant amount like batteries etc. are being disposed in the normal stream of waste disposal. The municipal corporations have to cover the whole gamut of awareness creation, strict segregation at source and final disposal in detail and with seriousness.
  9. MSW Rules 2013 need to be explicit and stringent on the need to strictly control the distribution of plastic carry bags in various kinds of shopping, a very large proportion of which end up in the garbage stream and are posing very serious environmental challenges. In Mumbai, all waterways like nullahs, creeks and the sea are choked with such plastic bags. During monsoons the sea throws all the plastic and other refuse out and makes a complete mess of the beaches.

The Waste to Energy part has been added new and one wonders whether that is the sole purpose of the new set of rules.